Searching for Answers Corp (ANSW)

Written by: Zack Miller | May 27, 2007

guru.jpgBy Zack Miller

Web 2.0 is awash with advertising-driven revenue models. Answers.com (ANSW) has grown quickly on the back of numerous trends: meta-dictionaries, blogging, aggregation and what I like to refer to as the Google Effect: stand back in awe and watch the after-effect of some good Google love. For the unitiated, Answers receives much of its traffic from the ‘definition’ link where Google currently links (in an informal, non-contractual way) to Answers’ pages for definitions based on a list of trigger words.

Looking at average daily queries growth (the average of how many searches are conducted on Answers.com), we see impressive numbers. Traffic has grown 88% when comparing Q1 of 2007 over Q1 of 2006.

Web publishers tend to use the RPM metric (Revenues per thousand web pages served) as a measure of success in monetization effort and Answers is making good strides: 35% growth in RPM this quarter versues first quarter 2006. Things are looking good. While RPM growth is strong, it’s clearly lagging query growth. I’d like to see this catch up.

And that’s the rub.

The interesting thing here though is that while Answers.com’s content model is very much Web 2.0, its revenue model isn’t. Ad sales models are built on old-school principles: buy low, sell high. Admittedly, Answers needs to ramp up its sales efforts and execute. Managing a sales team is good for the business but is definitely not sexy. It costs money to hire good talent and takes even more time to manage them efficiently.

I won’t even get into the reliance on Google for traffic and monetization efforts. Google has Answers by the proverbial short-hairs and perhaps may eventually take them out. Until then, I’m nervous that Google plays such a crucial role in bringing the eyeballs and then monetizing them.

I love Answers’ service. My kids and I use it for book reports, science experiments (my daughter wanted to put an iPod in Coca Cola), and just good research. From my perch, Answers is now a show-me stock dependent on the good graces of Google and the execution of a sales team.

Like what you see? Sign up to receive daily updates from IsraelNewsletter here.

Please see our Disclaimer HERE.

Related posts

Category: Software, answ, google

4 Comments »

Pingback by Israel Newsletter News Roundup 7/17/2007 « Israel Newsletter on July 17, 2007

[...] of traffic that Answers currently does. See our previous coverage of the road ahead for Answers.com here.  Look for a followup from us on our take of the [...]

Pingback by Answers.com (ANSW): Why buying Dictionary.com puts it a Google Away from Being Google « Israel Newsletter on July 18, 2007

[...] what I’ve written previously here; the crux of my point could have been summarized as the following: while Answers.com’s content [...]

Comment by betty kennedy on July 19, 2007

excuse me, but i meant to ask your explanation of why ANSW buying dictionary.com puts it a Google away from being Google. Please explain in a way investors can understand. thanks so much. BK

Comment by Zack Miller on July 26, 2007

Hi Betty,
Thanks for your question.

Put simply, Answers.com revenue model is not scalable the way Google’s is. My article above was less about Google than it was about what Answers.com is thinking with this acquisition.

Leave a comment